- Questions and Answers
Can I sue if multiple rideshare companies denied me based on the same incorrect background check?
- Questions and Answers
Can I sue if multiple rideshare companies denied me based on the same incorrect background check?
Can I sue if multiple rideshare companies denied me based on the same incorrect background check?
I've been denied by Uber, Lyft, DoorDash, and Instacart all in the same month, and it's all because of the same error on my Checkr background check. The report shows a sex offense conviction that absolutely is not mine - wrong birthdate, wrong middle name, wrong county. I need gig work income desperately because I'm between jobs right now, but this one error has blocked me from every platform I've tried. I disputed it with Checkr six weeks ago and they still haven't fixed it. Meanwhile, I've applied to four different companies and been rejected by all of them because they all use Checkr and they're all seeing the same false conviction. This isn't just costing me one job opportunity - it's blocking me from an entire industry. I've lost thousands of dollars in potential earnings and I can't even get approved for a single platform. Can I take legal action for all these denials or do I have to sue each company separately?
When one background check error causes multiple employment denials across different companies, that actually strengthens your FCRA case significantly. You have potential claims against Checkr for the original error, and the fact that their single mistake blocked you from multiple income sources dramatically increases your damages.
Here's why multiple denials matter:
Increased damages calculation:
- Lost income from ALL platforms (Uber + Lyft + DoorDash + Instacart)
- Multiplied harm from being completely shut out of gig work
- Compounded emotional distress from repeated rejections
- Stronger argument for punitive damages given the widespread impact
Evidence of systemic harm:
- Proves this isn't an isolated incident affecting one opportunity
- Shows the pervasive damage one error can cause
- Demonstrates the screening company's market power and responsibility
- Illustrates why accuracy is so critical in background checks
Your immediate action plan:
- Save all denial notices: Collect adverse action notices from every platform that rejected you - Uber, Lyft, DoorDash, Instacart, and any others. These prove the scope of your harm.
- Document the identical error: Show that all platforms received the same incorrect information from Checkr about the sex offense conviction.
- Calculate cumulative lost income: Add up what you could have earned from all four platforms combined. This is your actual damages:
- Average earnings per platform per week/month
- Time period since denials
- Total potential income blocked by the error
- Gather identity mismatch proof: Collect evidence proving the conviction isn't yours:
- Your ID showing your correct birthdate and middle name
- Proof you've never lived in or been to the county listed
- Court records if available showing the actual offender's information
- Escalate the dispute: Since Checkr hasn't fixed this after six weeks despite it affecting multiple applications:
- Send them a certified letter demanding immediate correction
- List all the companies/opportunities affected
- Note the substantial ongoing financial harm
- State you're preserving legal rights
- Contact our firm immediately: This case has significant value because:
- Multiple employers denied you based on the same error
- The error involves a serious false accusation (sex offense)
- Six weeks with no correction despite obvious proof
- Thousands of dollars in calculable lost income
- Complete blockage from an entire employment sector
You don't need to sue each company separately. Your primary claim is against Checkr for:
- The original mixed file error
- Willful or negligent failure to correct despite clear evidence
- All resulting damages from every denial
The multiple platform rejections don't create separate lawsuits - they dramatically increase the damages in your case against Checkr. Every company that denied you based on Checkr's error adds to your lost income claim.
Additional considerations:
Particularly severe false accusation: Sex offense convictions are among the most damaging false reports possible. Courts recognize the special harm from being falsely accused of this type of crime.
Timing evidence: Six weeks without correction while you're hemorrhaging income opportunities could support willful violation claims.
Industry impact: Being blocked from the entire gig economy sector (not just one company) shows the catastrophic scope of Checkr's error.
Under the FCRA, your potential recovery includes:
- Actual damages: All lost income from all platforms
- Emotional distress from repeated rejections and false sex offense label
- Statutory damages ($100-$1,000) if Checkr acted negligently
- Punitive damages if their conduct was willful
- Attorney's fees paid by Checkr when we win
The fact that you've been blocked from four major platforms in one month because of a single error they won't fix is exactly the type of case the FCRA was designed to address. This could be worth tens of thousands of dollars depending on your potential earnings and how long this has gone on.
Don't wait for Checkr to maybe fix this eventually. Every day that passes is more lost income from all these platforms. We can force immediate correction through legal action and recover every dollar you've lost across all platforms, with no upfront cost to you.
R
ONGS™You pay nothing. The law makes them pay.


