Michael V.’s Fight to Reclaim His Life After Checkr’s Devastating Mistake

  • Blog
  • Michael V.’s Fight to Reclaim His Life After Checkr’s Devastating Mistake
Contact Us
1
2
3
22 Nov, 2024
2 min
268
case client card

Don’t Let Checkr Background Check Mistakes Ruin Your Career. Discover How to Protect Yourself Today.

Our client lost his job at DoorDash and his stability due to a Checkr background check error. Find out how we assisted him and how we can help you too!

Michael V. had found stability and security in a world where these things are often fleeting. He worked full-time with DoorDash for over a year, relying on its flexibility to make a decent living and support his family. DoorDash wasn’t just a job to him; it was his primary source of income. But that stability was shattered in the blink of an eye, thanks to a background check company’s careless mistake.

The Background Check That Changed Everything

It started like any other day in late May 2023. Michael was doing what he always did—working his regular shifts with DoorDash, dropping off meals, and planning how to make ends meet that month. He wasn’t worried about his upcoming background check from DoorDash; after all, nothing had changed since they last ran one. He had a few minor criminal records from years ago—like possession of marijuana and burglary tools—but they hadn’t been an issue before, so he didn’t expect them to be now.

That changed when Michael suddenly found himself locked out of his DoorDash account. At first, he thought it was a glitch—nothing a quick call to customer support couldn’t fix. But when he called, he was told his account had been deactivated. The reason? According to a recent background check, Michael was now associated with two serious criminal cases: a conviction for felony aggravated assault of a police officer and another for felony resisting arrest. He also saw a misdemeanor conviction involving weapons.

Michael was floored. He had never committed these crimes. How could this be happening?

A Family Name, A Criminal Mistake

The answer, he later learned, was a cruel mix-up. Michael wasn’t the only “Michael Anthony Venerable” in his family. His father and brother shared the same name but had different birth dates and Social Security numbers. Yet, when Checkr ran Michael’s background check, they somehow pulled up his brother’s records. Despite having his correct date of birth and Social Security number, Checkr slapped his brother’s criminal history onto Michael’s background report and sent it to DoorDash.

This reckless mistake cost Michael his job—and more than just his job. DoorDash deactivated his account immediately, citing these false criminal records as the reason. He missed the initial email notification of this “pre-adverse action,” and his livelihood had already crumbled by the time he figured out what was going on.

A Devastating Impact

Michael’s income from DoorDash was his lifeline. Without it, his world quickly spiraled out of control. He couldn’t keep up with his rent, and soon after, he was evicted from his home. Desperate, he turned to friends for temporary shelter, sometimes crashing on their couches, but most nights, he found himself sleeping in his car.

The financial hit didn’t stop there. Unable to pay his bills, Michael fell behind on his credit card payments. Creditors began calling non-stop, adding to the constant stress he was already facing. Worse yet, Michael’s inability to pay child support caused him to lose visitation rights with his daughter—his biggest heartbreak of all. He had been looking forward to her staying with him for the summer for months. Now, without a home or stable income, that dream was gone.

Each day became a struggle for survival. Michael would park his car in various places, trying to avoid police or anyone who might ask him to move. The Arizona summer heat made it nearly unbearable to sleep in his car, and the looming threat of violence or theft haunted him as he tried to rest. Simple comforts, like a hot shower, became rare luxuries he could only access by relying on the kindness of friends.

The Battle Begins

In early June 2023, Michael took immediate action. He contacted both DoorDash and Checkr, pleading for them to fix the mistake. He explained that the criminal records didn’t belong to him and asked for an investigation to correct the report. While Checkr agreed to reinvestigate, the damage had already been done. By the time they removed his brother’s records from his background check, weeks had passed, and Michael was still without work.

On June 14, 2023, Checkr confirmed they had corrected the error, issuing a new background check to DoorDash. But even with the corrected report, DoorDash refused to reactivate Michael’s account immediately. Instead, they asked him to reapply as if he were a brand-new driver. It made no sense to Michael—his background check was on file, and the error had been fixed. Yet, DoorDash dragged their feet, leaving him in limbo for weeks.

Losing More Than Just a Job

For 45 long days, Michael tried tirelessly to get his job back. Each day without work pushed him deeper into financial ruin. He applied to other gig platforms like Instacart, but the pay was far less than what he made with DoorDash. Instacart’s work was also physically demanding, requiring him to carry heavy groceries in the brutal Arizona heat. On top of his financial struggles, the physical toll of his new job left him exhausted.

The consequences of Checkr’s mistake were more than just financial—they affected every aspect of Michael’s life. He lost his home, his stability, and, worst of all, the ability to see his daughter. The emotional pain of not being able to provide for her and spend time with her was unbearable. Michael had always worked hard to give her the best life he could, but now, because of someone else’s negligence, he felt powerless.

Holding Checkr Accountable

This story is about more than just a clerical error. It’s about a company’s reckless disregard for the truth and its devastating impact on a hardworking man’s life. What Checkr did (or didn’t do) to and for Michael V. clearly violates the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), which requires background check companies like Checkr to follow “reasonable procedures to assure maximum possible accuracy” when reporting consumer information.

Had Checkr done its job correctly, it would have seen that the criminal records it reported didn’t match Michael’s date of birth or Social Security number. But they didn’t take the time or care to check, and Michael paid the price.

With the help of his attorney, Michael filed a lawsuit against Checkr for its blatant disregard of the FCRA. The suit alleged that Checkr failed to follow reasonable procedures to ensure that the background information they reported was accurate, costing Michael his job, his home, and his ability to care for his daughter. Consumer Attorneys successfully settled Michael's case for an amount that will help him get back on his feet and start rebuilding his life. With this settlement, Michael can begin the process of securing stable housing and regaining financial stability.

Seeking Justice and Moving Forward

Michael’s story is a stark reminder of how damaging inaccurate background checks can be. When companies like Checkr prioritize speed and automation over accuracy, innocent people suffer. Michael did not just fight for compensation—he fought to reclaim his life and ensure that no one else has to go through what he did.

Michael’s legal battle is over, but the scars left by this experience will not fade easily. The emotional and financial damage caused by Checkr’s negligence will take time to heal, but with the support of his legal team, Michael can now move forward and rebuild the life that was wrongfully taken from him.

If you’ve been the victim of a similar mistake, don’t hesitate to take action.
Contact Consumer Attorneys today to ensure your rights are protected, and that companies like Checkr are held accountable for the harm they cause.
Contact Us
imageDaniel Cohen is the Founding Partner of Consumer Attorneys
About the lawyer
Daniel Cohen
See more post

Daniel Cohen is the Founder of Consumer Attorneys. Daniel manages the firm’s branding, marketing, client intake and business development efforts. Since 2017, he is a member of the National Association of Consumer Advocates and the National Consumer Law Center. Mr. Cohen is a nationally-recognized practitioner of consumer protection law. He has a we... Read more

Contact Us
INVESTIGATIVE ENGAGEMENT AGREEMENT

You, (“Client,” “you”), and Consumer Attorneys PLLC (“CA” or “we”), located at 72-47 139th street Flushing, NY 11367 (“CA”) , hereby enter into this limited scope retainer agreement whereby you agree to grant CA the exclusive authority to investigate your potential consumer law claim(s), including but not limited to potential violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”), Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), Equal Credit Opportunity Act (“ECOA”), Electronic Funds Transfer Act “EFTA”), Fair Credit Billing Act (“FCPA”), and/or the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA”) (collectively referenced as “consumer protection statutes”). 1Please read carefully before signing:

Authorization

You authorize CA to investigate your potential consumer law claim(s) under state and federal consumer protection statutes. You authorize CA to contact third parties on your behalf for the limited purpose of investigating your potential consumer law claims. “Third parties” include but are not limited to consumer reporting agencies, creditors, lenders, debt collectors, rental agencies, employers, courts, and law enforcement agencies.

CA’s Exclusive Investigative Period

CA agrees to investigate your potential consumer law claims in good faith. By signing this agreement, you agree to give CA the exclusive right to investigate your potential consumer law claim(s) for the next 180 days (“Exclusive Investigative Period”). For the duration of the Exclusive Investigative Period, you agree that you will not communicate with any other law firm or legal representative about your potential consumer law claim(s). You agree to forgo any previously scheduled consultation or case review until CA’s Exclusive Investigative Period concludes.

Termination of Exclusive Investigation Period

CA agrees that the Exclusive Investigative Period may not extend beyond 180 days without your prior written consent.

At any time between the date of this agreement and the expiration of CA’s Exclusive Investigative Period, CA may inform you of the outcome of its investigation. If CA’s investigation reveals that you have an actional consumer law claim, CA may ask you to sign a formal retainer agreement. If CA’s investigation does not reveal an actionable consumer law claim, you will receive an e-mail that states CA will not represent you in any further pursuit of your potential claim(s).

The relationship between you and CA automatically terminates at 5pm on the 180th day of the Exclusive Investigative Period or your receipt of CA’s written notice to decline representation, whichever comes sooner. At the conclusion of the Exclusive Investigative Period or upon receipt of CA’s written declination of representation, you are permitted to seek alternative legal counsel without penalty.

Nothing in this agreement should be construed as a promise or guarantee that CA will represent you in a consumer lawsuit at any point in time. CA reserves the right to decline to represent you for any reason permitted by relevant laws and ethical rules.

Your Involvement and Promises to us

You agree to meaningfully participate and cooperate in CA’s investigation of your potential consumer law claim(s). You agree to immediately inform CA if your mailing address, e-mail address, or phone number changes at any point during the Exclusive Investigative Period.
You agree to provide all relevant information, communications, documents, materials, and all other similar instruments to CA and its representatives during the Exclusive Investigative Period. You understand that your failure to provide all relevant information, communications, documents, and materials to CA during the Exclusive Investigative Period may hinder, delay or otherwise frustrate CA’s investigation of your potential consumer law claim(s).

You agree, under penalty of perjury, to provide complete, accurate, and truthful information to CA. All documents and communications, oral or written, past or future, provided to CA during the Exclusive Investigative Period and anytime thereafter are presumed by CA to be true, complete, and accurate.

Fees and Costs Incurred During Exclusive Investigative Period

CA agrees that you will not incur any out-of-pocket fees or costs during CA’s Exclusive Investigative Period. However, if CA agrees to represent you in a consumer lawsuit, CA may recover the fees and costs incurred during the Exclusive Investigative Period from the Defendant pursuant to a future settlement or judgment.

You agree that CA has a right to place a lien on any future monetary recovery obtained by client related to the claims identified during CA’s Exclusive Investigative Period or as a result of CA’s investigative efforts. If you refuse to cooperate with CA in the formal pursuit of the consumer law claim(s) it identifies during or after the Exclusive Investigative Period, you agree that CA has the right to recover the fees and costs it incurred while investigating your potential consumer law claim(s).

Authorization to Use Your Electronic Signature

CA will send you any and all documents that require your signature. You authorize CA to affix your electronic signature to requests, disclosures, or other forms that CA deems reasonably necessary to the investigation of your potential consumer law claim(s) upon receipt of your approval or after the 7th day after the document was sent to you, whichever comes first. Your electronic signature will be used on any and all other subsequent documents that will need signature, affirmation, acknowledgment, or any other forms of authentication in reference to this matter under the above referenced procedure.

1You also agree to give CA the exclusive authority to investigate potential violations of state-specific consumer protection statutes.

All Rights Reserved. Without Prejudice. CONSUMER ATTORNEYS

FORM # INV2024CA119

I have read and agree to the Privacy Policy, Investigative Retainer
Supported file formats:
Free Case Review
Zero Costs and Fees to You.
You pay nothing. The law makes them pay.
Get started
Contact Us
Head Office NY
68-29 Main Street, Flushing NY 11367
8095 N. 85th Way, Scottsdale, AZ 85258
Our social media
Our rating services
TrustpilotGoogle Business