Consumer Attorneys Wins Big Judgment in Credit Reporting Lawsuit Against Nissan

  • Blog
  • Consumer Attorneys Wins Big Judgment in Credit Reporting Lawsuit Against Nissan
Contact Us
1
2
3
19 Apr, 2024
11 min
556
Lawsuit Against Nissan

Consumer Attorneys Wins a Big Judgment Against Nissan for Credit Reporting Errors that Tanked a Mortgage Application

When a mortgage application is denied due to inaccurate, misleading, or false information in a credit report, it causes negative consequences for the consumer, mortgage broker, and other financial entities invested in closing the deal. Consumer Attorneys won big against Nissan for reporting deal-crushing wrongful data. We can help you, too.

Consumer Attorneys won a notable judgment in a lawsuit against Nissan Motors America Corporation (Nissan) for credit reporting errors that proved detrimental to an otherwise healthy mortgage application.

The Lawsuit Against Nissan

Our client was denied a mortgage approval based on erroneous information provided by Nissan, which showed up in her credit profile for all three credit bureaus (Experian, Equifax, and TransUnion). Specifically, Nissan reported misleading information about the status of three prior auto leases in her name.

Two leases terminated in 2010, and one terminated in 2013, and she no longer owed money on any of the accounts. However, when our client applied for a mortgage pre-approval in 2021, she was denied based on the misleading and inaccurate way that Nissan reported the status of all three lease accounts.

Each account was reported as open but terminated (meaning that the lease term had ended) with a balance owing and no payment being made while also reporting that the consumer had a monthly payment obligation, causing the credit bureaus to generate credit reports in her name with the following information about the prior leases:

  • Experian: Each account was reported as open, with a balance, and the comment, “Full termination/balance owing.”
  • TransUnion: Each account was reported as open, with a balance, and the comment, “Full termination/balance owing.”
  • Equifax: Each account was reported as open, with a balance, and the comment, “Lease - full termination.”

Further, the credit bureaus reported that the last payments were made on these lease accounts in 2011 and 2013 but that $0 monthly payments were being made on the accounts. This further enhanced the appearance that our client was simply failing to make payments toward an outstanding financial obligation when there was none.

Nissan Failed to Adequately Investigate or Correct the Errors

When our client disputed the wrongful information, Nissan failed to adequately investigate or correct the errors in their entirety. Nissan’s erroneous reporting and insufficient remediation of the wrongful data resulted in our client’s decreased credit score and creditworthiness, forcing her to suspend her house search indefinitely and causing her to suffer emotional damages.

We filed a lawsuit against Nissan for the harm our client sustained as a result of Nissan’s actions.

The Nissan Lawsuit Outcome

Because our client resides in California, we brought counts under both the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) and the state Consumer Credit Reporting Agencies Act (CCRAA), both of which regulate the gathering, reviewing, and disseminating of consumer data.

The FCRA and the CCRAA afford legal rights to consumers when inaccurate, misleading, or false data is included in a credit report and impose legal obligations on the companies reporting this data. Specifically, companies such as Nissan must report accurate information, investigate and resolve inaccurate information adequately, and promptly make all necessary changes to the consumer’s credit report.

Based on our legal representation, the Nissan lawsuit resolved with an Offer Of Judgment from Nissan to our client in the amount of $600,000.

Unwarranted Mortgage Denials Have Broad Consequences

One of the most personal and exhilarating accomplishments for many Americans is purchasing a house and making it a home. On the outside, this process typically involves many hours (sometimes spread across weeks or months) searching for a house that fits a consumer’s needs concerning budget, lifestyle, location, and family.

Behind the scenes, this process also entails the hard work of ensuring that a mortgage-worthy credit profile is maintained or that any credit challenges have been surmounted. Most consumers must wait years to have the full financial profile to make them a good candidate for a mortgage loan.

This sweat equity and dream building is every consumer’s right and pays off in spades when they find the perfect property. Importantly, not only is the consumer directly invested in closing the deal, but so are real estate agents and mortgage brokers. When inaccurate, misleading, or false information in a credit report derails the mortgage process, each party is impacted adversely.

How Mortgage Brokers Lose Out, Too

The consumer is denied the opportunity to move forward on a home purchase, sometimes even missing out on a specific house. The real estate agent is denied the opportunity to capitalize on the hours invested in sifting through listings and showing properties. And the mortgage broker is denied the opportunity to lock in a lucrative deal.

Further, when a mortgage broker is forced to deny a mortgage based on incorrect information in a credit report, it frequently results in the consumer seeking mortgage lending services elsewhere when the credit issues are finally cleared. So, mortgage brokers are impacted by the loss of the immediate real estate transaction and the likely loss of any future real estate transaction with that particular client.

What to do if you’re denied a mortgage approval based on an erroneous credit report

This is a serious situation that warrants legal attention and guidance. You should contact a highly skilled and experienced consumer protection law firm, such as Consumer Attorneys. (See below for how we can help.)

You should also dispute the erroneous information with the company reporting it and notify the mortgage broker of the formal dispute. Provide any documentation required to support your position. In addition, we advise against using online dispute platforms because such use frequently requires a waiver of your right to bring a lawsuit, and you want to preserve your right to use that solution if you need it.

File your dispute and provide documentation via certified mail to the addresses provided by the company in question.

How Consumer Attorneys Can Help Consumers

If you are faced with inaccurate, misleading, or false information in a credit report that causes lost financial or other opportunities, the top-tier attorneys at Consumer Attorneys can help restore your credit, repair the damage, and compensate you for the harm you endured.

The attorneys at Consumer Attorneys are dedicated FCRA pros who know how to navigate this complex legal landscape to protect you.

Our highly knowledgeable lawyers will be able to:

  1. Explain your rights. Both federal and state law protects consumers in situations like this. In a transaction with multiple parties with vested interests, multiple entities reporting inaccurate, misleading, or false information, and significant consequences for you, having a well-versed and savvy legal advocate is critical.
  2. Explain the other parties’ legal obligations. It isn’t just that you have certain rights under the relevant laws; it’s also that the credit bureaus and the businesses reporting information to them have legal obligations to get it right. And when it isn’t right, they have legal obligations to make it right. Unfortunately, that doesn’t always happen, but that’s where we come in.
  3. File a lawsuit on your behalf. If the companies who have harmed you with faulty reporting are incomplete, inadequate, or lacking in their response, we will file a lawsuit to salvage your credit profile, compensate you for any harm suffered, and restore your dreams of home ownership.

How Consumer Attorneys Can Help Mortgage Brokers

If you are a mortgage broker whose prospective client was denied a mortgage approval based on inaccurate, misleading, or false information in that person’s credit report, you can also benefit from referring them to us for help.

Once we’ve done the boots-on-the-ground legal work to restore their good credit, your quick-thinking and problem-solving referral to Consumer Attorneys will also restore their trust in you. This can translate into an increased likelihood of them returning to work with you to secure a mortgage as soon as they’re ready.

Ask for Our Help Now

Consumer Attorneys has talented consumer protection lawyers in twenty states and counting. Plus, we maintain a thriving attorney referral network, so we will always be able to help you, whether we represent you ourselves or get you to another attorney who can.

There are several ways to reach us: call +1 877-615-1725, email [email protected], fill out the online intake form, or use our virtual chat option.

Let our expertise power your win. We look forward to helping you!

Daniel Cohen is the Founding Partner of Consumer Attorneys
About the author
Daniel Cohen
See more post

Daniel Cohen is the Founder of Consumer Attorneys. Daniel manages the firm’s branding, marketing, client intake and business development efforts. Since 2017, he is a member of the National Association of Consumer Advocates and the National Consumer Law Center. Mr. Cohen is a nationally-recognized practitioner of consumer protection law. He has a wealth of proven legal experience in the US in: collective claims, representing visually impaired people who believe their rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act have been violated in both the physical and digital environments, corporate governance and dispute resolution. Read more

Contact Us
INVESTIGATIVE ENGAGEMENT AGREEMENT

You, (“Client,” “you”), and Consumer Attorneys PLC (“CA” or “we”), located at 8095 N. 85th Way, Scottsdale, AZ 85258 (“CA”) , hereby enter into this limited scope retainer agreement whereby you agree to grant CA the exclusive authority to investigate your potential consumer law claim(s), including but not limited to potential violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”), Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), Equal Credit Opportunity Act (“ECOA”), Electronic Funds Transfer Act “EFTA”), Fair Credit Billing Act (“FCPA”), and/or the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA”) (collectively referenced as “consumer protection statutes”). 1Please read carefully before signing:

Authorization

You authorize CA to investigate your potential consumer law claim(s) under state and federal consumer protection statutes. You authorize CA to contact third parties on your behalf for the limited purpose of investigating your potential consumer law claims. “Third parties” include but are not limited to consumer reporting agencies, creditors, lenders, debt collectors, rental agencies, employers, courts, and law enforcement agencies.

CA’s Exclusive Investigative Period

CA agrees to investigate your potential consumer law claims in good faith. By signing this agreement, you agree to give CA the exclusive right to investigate your potential consumer law claim(s) for the next 180 days (“Exclusive Investigative Period”). For the duration of the Exclusive Investigative Period, you agree that you will not communicate with any other law firm or legal representative about your potential consumer law claim(s). You agree to forgo any previously scheduled consultation or case review until CA’s Exclusive Investigative Period concludes.

Termination of Exclusive Investigation Period

CA agrees that the Exclusive Investigative Period may not extend beyond 180 days without your prior written consent.

At any time between the date of this agreement and the expiration of CA’s Exclusive Investigative Period, CA may inform you of the outcome of its investigation. If CA’s investigation reveals that you have an actional consumer law claim, CA may ask you to sign a formal retainer agreement. If CA’s investigation does not reveal an actionable consumer law claim, you will receive an e-mail that states CA will not represent you in any further pursuit of your potential claim(s).

The relationship between you and CA automatically terminates at 5pm on the 180th day of the Exclusive Investigative Period or your receipt of CA’s written notice to decline representation, whichever comes sooner. At the conclusion of the Exclusive Investigative Period or upon receipt of CA’s written declination of representation, you are permitted to seek alternative legal counsel without penalty.

Nothing in this agreement should be construed as a promise or guarantee that CA will represent you in a consumer lawsuit at any point in time. CA reserves the right to decline to represent you for any reason permitted by relevant laws and ethical rules.

Your Involvement and Promises to us

You agree to meaningfully participate and cooperate in CA’s investigation of your potential consumer law claim(s). You agree to immediately inform CA if your mailing address, e-mail address, or phone number changes at any point during the Exclusive Investigative Period.
You agree to provide all relevant information, communications, documents, materials, and all other similar instruments to CA and its representatives during the Exclusive Investigative Period. You understand that your failure to provide all relevant information, communications, documents, and materials to CA during the Exclusive Investigative Period may hinder, delay or otherwise frustrate CA’s investigation of your potential consumer law claim(s).

You agree, under penalty of perjury, to provide complete, accurate, and truthful information to CA. All documents and communications, oral or written, past or future, provided to CA during the Exclusive Investigative Period and anytime thereafter are presumed by CA to be true, complete, and accurate.

Fees and Costs Incurred During Exclusive Investigative Period

CA agrees that you will not incur any out-of-pocket fees or costs during CA’s Exclusive Investigative Period. However, if CA agrees to represent you in a consumer lawsuit, CA may recover the fees and costs incurred during the Exclusive Investigative Period from the Defendant pursuant to a future settlement or judgment.

You agree that CA has a right to place a lien on any future monetary recovery obtained by client related to the claims identified during CA’s Exclusive Investigative Period or as a result of CA’s investigative efforts. If you refuse to cooperate with CA in the formal pursuit of the consumer law claim(s) it identifies during or after the Exclusive Investigative Period, you agree that CA has the right to recover the fees and costs it incurred while investigating your potential consumer law claim(s).

Authorization to Use Your Electronic Signature

CA will send you any and all documents that require your signature. You authorize CA to affix your electronic signature to requests, disclosures, or other forms that CA deems reasonably necessary to the investigation of your potential consumer law claim(s) upon receipt of your approval or after the 7th day after the document was sent to you, whichever comes first. Your electronic signature will be used on any and all other subsequent documents that will need signature, affirmation, acknowledgment, or any other forms of authentication in reference to this matter under the above referenced procedure.

1You also agree to give CA the exclusive authority to investigate potential violations of state-specific consumer protection statutes.

All Rights Reserved. Without Prejudice. CONSUMER ATTORNEYS

FORM # INV2024CA119

Attorney Advertising, Prior Results Do Not Guarantee A Similar Outcome. This website is for informational purposes only and does not contain legal advice. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

© 2024 Consumer Attorneys PLC. All Rights Reserved.