LeasingDesk Screening Report Dispute: Can You Sue for Damages?

  • Blog
  • LeasingDesk Screening Report Dispute: Can You Sue for Damages?
Contact Us
1
2
3
3 Jul, 2024
2 min
1099
Ways to correct a background check error in a report generated by LeasingDesk

Errors in a LeasingDesk by RealPage report can wreck hopes of finding a home. Here’s what to do if it happens to you.

Property managers use LeasingDesk by RealPage reports to assess the creditworthiness of rental applicants. Sometimes LeasingDesk reports are inaccurate. When that happens, you can lose your chance of renting a home. But here’s how to fix the report, repair your reputation, and hold LeasingDesk accountable.

LeasingDesk is a service from a company called RealPage that has a big role in determining which renter applicants get approved for an apartment and which renter applicants get denied. This article explains the process LeasingDesk screening uses, how that process can foster inaccuracies and errors, and what potential renters can do if they identify an error in their LeasingDesk screening report and that error causes a landlord or property manager to deny them housing.

As lawyers for consumers, we proudly and eagerly offer guidance and support to renters through the challenging process of disputing an inaccurate LeasingDesk screening report.

LeasingDesk Screening Report

Landlords and property managers use a LeasingDesk screening report to evaluate the risk of renting to potential tenants. The LeasingDesk screening report uses the following to determine if a rental applicant will be a suitable tenant:

  • Your credit information
  • Your income
  • Your criminal history
  • Your rental history
  • Your rent payment history
  • Your debt-to-income ratio
  • Your eviction history
  • Your property damage history

The report condenses the above information to provide a LeasingDesk score of pass or fail. Landlords, property managers, and anyone else involved in the rental decision-making process find these reports to be valuable. However, the quick turnaround time means if LeasingDesk reviews your score, it does so quickly. Because former property managers can neglect to update their data, and because administrative mistakes happen, this speed means that a LeasingDesk screening report can contain errors, outdated information, or outright wrong information that unjustly affects a rental applicant’s pass or fail rating.

LeasingDesk Hard Inquiry

Rental applicants often ask, “Why is LeasingDesk on my credit report?” To produce their LeasingDesk background report, LeasingDesk pulls your credit information. This results in a LeasingDesk hard inquiry on your credit report, which can lower your credit score and LeasingDesk credit report inquiries can stay on your credit report for up to two years. You should be aware of this, especially if you are filling out multiple rental applications at multiple apartments. These multiple inquiries can add up.

LeasingDesk Background Check Dispute

Should you become aware of errors or inaccuracies in your LeasingDesk screening report, you must correct them promptly. LeasingDesk errors range from incorrect credit information to outdated or mistaken criminal history or inaccurate rental history data. To correct the report, you must file a dispute. Disputing these inaccuracies can help ensure that your rental application is judged fairly.

Here’s how you can start the LeasingDesk dispute process:

  • Get a copy of your LeasingDesk report. RealPage, the company that owns LeasingDesk, will provide one free report every year. To request the report, go to the RealPage website.
  • Identify inaccuracies. Closely examine all sections of the report. Look for any errors in personal information, length of stay at former residences, inaccurate payment information, LeasingDesk criminal background errors, or any inaccurate financial data.
  • Collect evidence to disprove the errors. Collect any documents, emails from former landlords, and credit statements, and take screenshots of reports that support your position.
  • File a dispute. Write a letter to LeasingDesk identifying yourself, explaining the inaccuracies, and including any document evidence. We recommend doing this via certified mail so you do not waive any future rights to take legal action.
  • Contact credit report lawyers. LeasingDesk must obey the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), a federal law that governs how reporting companies must treat consumers including how it must handle disputes. LeasingDesk must investigate your dispute and respond in 30 days. We are always here to guide you through the dispute process and help you however we can. The sooner you contact us, the sooner a lawyer will be able to file a lawsuit should LeasingDesk fail to obey the law, if it fails to correct the error, or if you have already experienced the loss of a rental opportunity because of the error.

Inaccurate information in your LeasingDesk screening report can have significant consequences. If you have been denied a rental for which you were qualified because LeasingDesk made an error, you have rights and legal remedies to compensate you for the damage.

If you have experienced any issues with background check errors associated with your LeasingDesk report that have not been resolved within the promised resolution duration, reach out to Consumer Attorneys to rectify the situation! You can connect with our legal team in various ways:

  • Call +1 877-615-1725 for immediate assistance and a free case review.
  • Fill out our brief Contact Us form or initiate a live chat to share your concerns.

Reach out to us at [email protected] with any questions.

Frequently Asked Questions

A LeasingDesk score is a pass/fail rating from a company called RealPage. Landlords, property managers, and others in the property rental industry pay LeasingDesk to create the score to evaluate the risk of renting to potential tenants. LeasingDesk calculates the score from specific factors like the applicant’s rental history, income, debt, criminal records, credit history, payment records, and other public record information. The LeasingDesk score differs from conventional credit scores as it focuses on rental-specific elements like histories of unpaid rent and eviction records. Decisionmakers in the property rental arena use this score to predict the likelihood of a prospective tenant paying their rent on time, maintaining the property, and generally fulfilling the obligations of their lease. It's a tool in the application process for property managers and landlords and, therefore, must be accurate.

LeasingDesk screening is a service from a company called RealPage. Landlords and property managers use LeaningDesk to screen potential renters and gauge whether those renters will be reliable. LeasingDesk evaluates various sources, including credit assessment, criminal background checks, income, debt, criminal history, rental history, and eviction records, to produce a profile of an applicant that is as thorough as possible. LeasingDesk aims to eliminate the possibility that landlords and property managers are renting apartments to people who habitually make late payments or leave apartments damaged. Property managers and property owners use LeasingDesk to make informed decisions about who they rent to, so LeasingDesk screening needs to be accurate. When the screening is not accurate, the consequences for potential renters are devastating.

The speed of LeasingDesk screening results depends on many factors. While typically, property managers can get results from a LeasingDesk credit inquiry in a few minutes, the speed of the screening will take longer if the property manager requests complicated information, there are many databases to access, and the databases take a long time to respond to the LeasingDesk inquiry. For a basic credit and background check, the LeasingDesk process is usually automated and quick. Discrepancies in the applicant's information or other delays in accessing certain records will make the process take longer. Property managers and landlords like the quick response from LeasingDesk, but the quick turnaround can also mean that inaccuracies and errors arise.

imageDaniel Cohen is the Founding Partner of Consumer Attorneys
About the lawyer
Daniel Cohen
See more post

Daniel Cohen is the Founder of Consumer Attorneys. Daniel manages the firm’s branding, marketing, client intake and business development efforts. Since 2017, he is a member of the National Association of Consumer Advocates and the National Consumer Law Center. Mr. Cohen is a nationally-recognized practitioner of consumer protection law. He has a we... Read more

Contact Us
INVESTIGATIVE ENGAGEMENT AGREEMENT

You, (“Client,” “you”), and Consumer Attorneys PLC (“CA” or “we”), located at 8095 N. 85th Way, Scottsdale, AZ 85258 (“CA”) , hereby enter into this limited scope retainer agreement whereby you agree to grant CA the exclusive authority to investigate your potential consumer law claim(s), including but not limited to potential violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”), Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), Equal Credit Opportunity Act (“ECOA”), Electronic Funds Transfer Act “EFTA”), Fair Credit Billing Act (“FCPA”), and/or the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA”) (collectively referenced as “consumer protection statutes”). 1Please read carefully before signing:

Authorization

You authorize CA to investigate your potential consumer law claim(s) under state and federal consumer protection statutes. You authorize CA to contact third parties on your behalf for the limited purpose of investigating your potential consumer law claims. “Third parties” include but are not limited to consumer reporting agencies, creditors, lenders, debt collectors, rental agencies, employers, courts, and law enforcement agencies.

CA’s Exclusive Investigative Period

CA agrees to investigate your potential consumer law claims in good faith. By signing this agreement, you agree to give CA the exclusive right to investigate your potential consumer law claim(s) for the next 180 days (“Exclusive Investigative Period”). For the duration of the Exclusive Investigative Period, you agree that you will not communicate with any other law firm or legal representative about your potential consumer law claim(s). You agree to forgo any previously scheduled consultation or case review until CA’s Exclusive Investigative Period concludes.

Termination of Exclusive Investigation Period

CA agrees that the Exclusive Investigative Period may not extend beyond 180 days without your prior written consent.

At any time between the date of this agreement and the expiration of CA’s Exclusive Investigative Period, CA may inform you of the outcome of its investigation. If CA’s investigation reveals that you have an actional consumer law claim, CA may ask you to sign a formal retainer agreement. If CA’s investigation does not reveal an actionable consumer law claim, you will receive an e-mail that states CA will not represent you in any further pursuit of your potential claim(s).

The relationship between you and CA automatically terminates at 5pm on the 180th day of the Exclusive Investigative Period or your receipt of CA’s written notice to decline representation, whichever comes sooner. At the conclusion of the Exclusive Investigative Period or upon receipt of CA’s written declination of representation, you are permitted to seek alternative legal counsel without penalty.

Nothing in this agreement should be construed as a promise or guarantee that CA will represent you in a consumer lawsuit at any point in time. CA reserves the right to decline to represent you for any reason permitted by relevant laws and ethical rules.

Your Involvement and Promises to us

You agree to meaningfully participate and cooperate in CA’s investigation of your potential consumer law claim(s). You agree to immediately inform CA if your mailing address, e-mail address, or phone number changes at any point during the Exclusive Investigative Period.
You agree to provide all relevant information, communications, documents, materials, and all other similar instruments to CA and its representatives during the Exclusive Investigative Period. You understand that your failure to provide all relevant information, communications, documents, and materials to CA during the Exclusive Investigative Period may hinder, delay or otherwise frustrate CA’s investigation of your potential consumer law claim(s).

You agree, under penalty of perjury, to provide complete, accurate, and truthful information to CA. All documents and communications, oral or written, past or future, provided to CA during the Exclusive Investigative Period and anytime thereafter are presumed by CA to be true, complete, and accurate.

Fees and Costs Incurred During Exclusive Investigative Period

CA agrees that you will not incur any out-of-pocket fees or costs during CA’s Exclusive Investigative Period. However, if CA agrees to represent you in a consumer lawsuit, CA may recover the fees and costs incurred during the Exclusive Investigative Period from the Defendant pursuant to a future settlement or judgment.

You agree that CA has a right to place a lien on any future monetary recovery obtained by client related to the claims identified during CA’s Exclusive Investigative Period or as a result of CA’s investigative efforts. If you refuse to cooperate with CA in the formal pursuit of the consumer law claim(s) it identifies during or after the Exclusive Investigative Period, you agree that CA has the right to recover the fees and costs it incurred while investigating your potential consumer law claim(s).

Authorization to Use Your Electronic Signature

CA will send you any and all documents that require your signature. You authorize CA to affix your electronic signature to requests, disclosures, or other forms that CA deems reasonably necessary to the investigation of your potential consumer law claim(s) upon receipt of your approval or after the 7th day after the document was sent to you, whichever comes first. Your electronic signature will be used on any and all other subsequent documents that will need signature, affirmation, acknowledgment, or any other forms of authentication in reference to this matter under the above referenced procedure.

1You also agree to give CA the exclusive authority to investigate potential violations of state-specific consumer protection statutes.

All Rights Reserved. Without Prejudice. CONSUMER ATTORNEYS

FORM # INV2024CA119

I have read and agree to the Privacy Policy, Investigative Retainer
Supported file formats:

Attorney Advertising, Prior Results Do Not Guarantee A Similar Outcome. This website is for informational purposes only and does not contain legal advice. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

© 2024 Consumer Attorneys PLC. All Rights Reserved.