What amounts to a reasonable investigation by a furnisher?

Written and Reviewed byDaniel Cohen
Last Updated:11 Sep, 2025
1499
6
Contact Us
1
2
3
reasonable investigation

The reasonableness of the investigation depends on the circumstances of a case

See how a furnisher's investigation can be reasonable or not.

Back-and-forths in the form of disputes are not alien to the credit space. So, when a consumer disputes an alleged inaccuracy in their credit report, the relevant credit reporting agency will inform the furnisher.

The furnisher should then carry out a reasonable investigation into the dispute. This post dives into the case of Hauge v Amerihome Mortgage Company to uncover the concept of reasonable investigation.

Keep reading.

Experian Dispute Form: How to Correct Errors on Your Credit Report

If you've found errors on your Experian credit report, filling out an Experian dispute form is a crucial first step in correcting them. Our legal team can guide you through the dispute process and help you gather the evidence needed to support your claim. Don't hesitate to contact us for assistance with your Experian dispute form and any related credit report issues.

Facts of the case

In this case, the plaintiff made mortgage payments using a third-party online payment processor called Check Free. While for three consecutive months, the plaintiff entered the wrong account number, the payments still went through. However, in the fourth month, the payment was rejected due to the incorrect account number.

The payment was rejected for the same reason when the plaintiff attempted to pay by check. Consequently, the payment was recorded as a delinquent payment due to the delay.

The plaintiff, however, disputed the report of delinquent payment with the relevant credit reporting agencies, each of which proceeded to send a copy of the dispute letter and an Automated Consumer Dispute Verification to the furnisher.

The defendant’s investigator reviewed the plaintiff’s account and service notes stating the plaintiff’s calls and proceeded to verify the plaintiff’s loan transaction and mortgage history. After countless twists and turns, the plaintiff initiated an action against the defendant alleging that, amongst other things, the defendant failed to reasonably investigate his disputed information.

The verdict and lessons

The defendant moved for summary judgment on the ground that, amongst other things, its investigation was reasonable and accurate. However, the court rejected the argument.

Why so?

The Fair Credit Reporting Act creates an obligation for furnishers of information to provide accurate information to credit reporting agencies.

If a consumer notices a credit reporting error, he has the right to dispute the error with the relevant credit reporting agencies. Once the credit reporting agencies notify the furnisher of the dispute, the furnisher is obligated to investigate the disputed information.

The FCRA mandates the furnisher to conduct a reasonable investigation.

What amounts to the reasonableness of an investigation is dependent on the circumstances of the case, and attention must be paid to what the agencies’ notice of dispute revealed to the furnisher. But in essence, a reasonable investigation demands careful inquiry by the furnisher.

However, evidence indicates that the defendant only focused on the plaintiff’s payment history.

A furnisher of information, such as the defendant, should not focus only on just the consumer’s payment history. This is because other aspects of the consumer’s account can yield much-needed information about when a consumer made payments.

In fact, if the defendant had carefully inquired into other areas of the plaintiff’s account they would have instantly discovered that the plaintiff attempted to submit payments promptly as before, only for it to be rejected by the defendants.

Also, the defendant’s failure to inform the credit reporting agencies of the reason for rejecting the plaintiff’s payment further highlights the unreasonableness of the investigation.

Credit reporting errors are a menace, but they are not the only threats that consumers face. Consumers have to deal with indolent furnishers as we can see in this case. With that being said, sign up for any of our legal packages today for steady support whenever the need arises.

image
Daniel Cohen is the Founding Partner of Consumer Attorneys
About the Author
Daniel Cohen

Daniel Cohen is the Founder of Consumer Attorneys. Daniel manages the firm’s branding, marketing, client intake and business development efforts. Since 2017, he is a member of the National Association of Consumer Advocates and the National Consumer Law Center. Mr. Cohen is a nationally-recognized practitioner of consumer protection law. He has a we... Read more

Contact Us
Select subject
I have read and agree to the Privacy Policy
Supported file formats:
Blog

Related Articles

Common Background Check Errors: What Goes Wrong & Why
2 Jul, 2026
Daniel Cohen
Common Background Check Errors and Mistakes (With Real Examples)
Background check errors happen way more often than the screening industry would have you believe. Here’s a number that feels quite uncomfortable: a 2024 study published in Criminology found that 60% of participants had at least one false-positive error on a regulated background check report. Sixty percent. That’s not some rare glitch in the matrix. That’s the baseline.
5452
11 min
Fair Credit Reporting Act attorney helping consumers dispute inaccurate credit report information
29 Jun, 2026
Daniel Cohen
Fair Credit Reporting Act Attorney
Most people don’t think much about their credit report until something goes wrong. Then they discover that a wrong balance, an account that was never theirs, or someone else's bankruptcy is sitting in their file, and that it has already affected a loan, an apartment, or a job offer. By the time they realize what happened, the damage is done. The Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) exists specifically for situations like this. It gives consumers legal rights against the companies that compile and report consumer information, and it provides a path to both correction and financial recovery when those companies fail to follow the rules. If you’re trying to figure out whether the errors on your credit report cross into legal territory, how they can be corrected, and if you’re entitled to compensation, talking to a Fair Credit Reporting Act lawyer is the right starting point.
1579
10 min
Credit Repair Company vs. FCRA Attorney: What Consumers Should Know
29 Jun, 2026
Daniel Cohen
Credit Repair Company vs. FCRA Attorney: What’s the Difference?
If you’re dealing with a credit problem, it’s natural to search for a credit repair company or a credit fix attorney and expect to find someone who can truly help. The problem is that those terms cover two very different types of services, and knowing which one you actually need makes a big difference in what happens next. One is a paid service that disputes items on your behalf (credit repair service). The other is a legal practice that pursues claims under federal law when your rights have been violated (FCRA attorney). This page explains how the two work, where they overlap, and where they don’t.
1248
9 min
Neon line on dark background is going down
28 Jun, 2026
Daniel Cohen
Why Did Your Credit Score Drop for No Reason
Many things besides paying your bills on time affect your credit score. Here’s how to control the ones you can control.
1530
10 min
RIGHTS END
W

R

ONGS
Free Consultation
Zero Costs and Fees to You.
You pay nothing. The law makes them pay.
Contact Our Team
Contact Us
Location
Head Office NY
68-29 Main Street, Flushing, NY 11367
Office
706 East Bell Rd., Suite 114, Phoenix, AZ 85022
Office
2800 N. Druid Hills Rd, Bldg A, Ste D, Atlanta, GA 30329
Our social media
Our rating services
TrustpilotBetter Business BureauGoogle Business