3M Defective Combat Earplugs Lawsuit

Contact Us
1
2
3
23 Apr, 2024
11 min
1338
new york army earplug lawyer

The U.S. Department of Defense issued 3M’s Combat Arms Earplugs version 2 (CAEv2) as standard issue hearing protection devices to troops deployed to combat zones such as Iraq or Afghanistan between 2003 and 2015

In 2018, thanks to a whistleblower coming forward, the Justice Department found that 3M defrauded the government by selling earplugs with “dangerous design defects” to the military for “more than a decade.” 3M settled with the Justice Department for $9.1 million without admitting liability.

According to the whistleblower, 3M knew about the device defects as far back as 2000 and actively manipulated test results while continuing to manufacture and market the devices to the U.S. Military while appearing to meet government standards.

Now, over 230,000 service members and veterans have sued 3M and Aearo Technologies (3M’s parent company) in federal court for having knowingly sold defective combat earplugs to U.S. Troops from 2003 to 2015, and many more active-duty and servicemembers and veterans who have been harmed by 3M’s defective earplugs are coming forward to demand accountability.

Defects in Dual-Ended Combat 3M Earplugs

The 3M CAEv2 earplugs were allegedly too short and not designed to effectively “seal” into ear canal to block out the eardrum-damaging sound, as intended. As a result, the earplugs would loosen imperceptibly during use, rendering the earplugs essentially useless.

The earplugs featured a dual-ended or reversible design, which was intended to block all sound when inserted one way, but provide selective filtering when reversed, reducing loud impulse sounds while allowing users to hear spoken commands. 3M allegedly failed to properly instruct servicemembers on how to properly insert the earplug devices, which also caused hearing loss.

Have You Been Injured by 3M Earplugs?

Auditory system injuries, including hearing loss and tinnitus, was the third-most common service-related disability as far back as 2003. By 2017, however, tinnitus and hearing loss shot to the top of the charts and become the most common service-related disability.

Defective 3M earplugs may have been the culprit.

(1) Tinnitus

According to the Mayo Clinic, Tinnitus is when you experience ringing or other noises in one or both of your ears. The noise you hear when you have tinnitus isn't caused by an external sound, and other people usually can't hear it. Such sounds can include:

  • Ringing
  • Buzzing
  • Roaring
  • Whistling
  • Hissing
  • Clicking

Veterans with tinnitus may have difficulty concentrating and sleeping, and in most cases, the condition is permanent.

(2) Hearing Loss

Hearing loss can be a devastating long-term and permanent condition. Symptoms may include a person’s hearing gradually fading away and, as the condition progresses, may cause more severe hearing difficulties that results in substantial quality of life issues among other harms. A person may also experience ringing in the ears and sensitivity to sound.

Ongoing Lawsuits

Because of the large number of servicemember lawsuits, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation has centralized and transferred the cases into a multi-district litigation titled 3M Combat Arms Earplug Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2885, which is currently ongoing in the United States District Court of the Northern District of Florida.

Of the many thousands of lawsuits already filed against 3M, the Florida court has selected a handful to go to early trial. On April 30, 2021, a federal jury awarded $7.1 million in damages to three Army veterans, finding that 3M failed to warn about design flaws in earplugs widely sold to the U.S. military that ultimately caused hearing loss.

What You Can Do

Servicemembers and veterans who actively used the earplugs between 2003 and 2015 may be able to file a lawsuit if they are experiencing any of the symptoms associated with the defect. If you have suffered from hearing loss or tinnitus and have served in the military between 2003 and 2015, you can still file a lawsuit against the manufacturer for compensation, medical bills, pain and suffering, and other financial and emotional losses you may have suffered. 

Consumer Attorneys LLP is an industry leader when it comes to protecting consumers from multi-national corporations and obtaining favorable outcomes. We will fully investigate and vociferously litigate your claims to achieve the results and compensation you deserve.

image
Daniel Cohen is the Founding Partner of Consumer Attorneys
About the Author
Daniel Cohen
See more post

Daniel Cohen is the Founder of Consumer Attorneys. Daniel manages the firm’s branding, marketing, client intake and business development efforts. Since 2017, he is a member of the National Association of Consumer Advocates and the National Consumer Law Center. Mr. Cohen is a nationally-recognized practitioner of consumer protection law. He has a we... Read more

Contact Us
Select subject
I have read and agree to the Privacy Policy
Supported file formats:
Blog

Related Articles

Split visual of a stack of documents transitioning from dark and blurred to clear and organized, illustrating the Fair Credit Reporting Act’s “complete and up-to-date” accuracy standard for public record information under §1681k(a)(2).
30 Dec, 2025
Meir Rubinov
The FCRA’s ‘Complete and Up to Date’ Standard Under § 1681k(a)(2): A True Accuracy Mandate
This article examines the FCRA’s “complete and up to date” requirement under §1681k(a)(2), tracing its legislative history, statutory meaning, and heightened accuracy obligations for public record information used in employment decisions.
1
6 min
Abstract digital visualization of legal documents and data streams, illustrating how sworn identity theft statements interact with consumer reporting systems under the Fair Credit Reporting Act.
29 Dec, 2025
Meir Rubinov
Sworn Truth, Ignored: How Reyes v. Equifax Undermines Identity Theft Protections and Misreads the FCRA
In Reyes v. Equifax, the Fifth Circuit affirmed summary judgment for Equifax, ruling that a consumer reporting agency isn’t required to delete accurate tradelines even when identity theft is alleged. This article examines the court’s logic, statutory framework in the Fair Credit Reporting Act, and the implications for consumer rights and identity-theft protections.
1
10 min
Blurred silhouette of a person standing in the background with a stack of documents in the foreground, symbolizing legal records and the recognition of emotional distress as actual damages under the Electronic Fund Transfer Act.
23 Dec, 2025
Meir Rubinov
“Actual Damages” Under the EFTA Include Emotional Distress
The Electronic Fund Transfer Act (EFTA) empowers consumers to recover “actual damages” for violations of its provisions. Because “actual damages” isn’t limited by statute to just economic loss, courts have recognized that non-economic harms like emotional distress may be compensable. Learn how this interpretation strengthens consumer rights and what it could mean for your case with Consumer Attorneys PLLC.
7
7 min
Abstract layered illustration of a credit report interface with data panels, charts, and digital elements, representing how credit information is compiled, analyzed, and how inaccuracies can affect consumers’ lives.
23 Dec, 2025
Meir Rubinov
Inaccurate Credit Reports: How Common Errors Shape Consumers’ Lives
Credit reports quietly shape access to loans, housing, jobs, and insurance. Drawing on decades of government and consumer research, this article examines how common credit report errors really are, why they persist, and how inaccurate data continues to harm consumers’ lives.
6
5 min
RIGHTS END
W

R

ONGS
Free Consultation
Zero Costs and Fees to You.
You pay nothing. The law makes them pay.
Contact Our Team
Contact Us
Our social media
Our rating services
TrustpilotBetter Business BureauGoogle Business
Attorney Advertising - Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. This website is for informational purposes only and does not contain legal advice. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances. See our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy for specific information about the use of our online services.

© 2025 Consumer Attorneys PLLC. All Rights Reserved.