What's Worse Than a Plague?

  • Blog
  • What's Worse Than a Plague?
Contact Us
1
2
3
17 Mar, 2023
11 min
490
whats worse than a plague

A letter from our founder, Daniel Cohen

More and more Americans are trying to dispute credit report mistakes every year, and the rising number of those dispute claims that are being dismissed or denied has been kept from the CFPB until recently.

There is a wave of human, financial suffering quietly building in America. It began a while ago, but has gained strength from the pandemic. Faulty or mistaken credit reports are setting back or destroying Americans’ ability to make money or secure a home at an exponential rate. The numbers of innocent people who are being removed from the productive class of society are hard to take in, and hard to agree upon. 

Suddenly deprived of their credit standing, or having it replaced with that of a criminal or deceased person, can send anyone tumbling down the economic ladder. A growing number of Americans are not fighting their way back up. In many of these cases, their loss is a windfall gain for the people that put them there. 

It’s a lot to unpack.

The economy runs on credit at all levels. Personal credit is a commodity supplied by three main corporations. Equifax, Experian, and Transunion all sell Credit reports to companies looking to hire employees or finance purchases. Making and spending money are the essence of any economy. An individual’s place in that economy, and any opportunities they might get to improve it, are determined by their credit report. A person’s credit report decides where they start in an economy, and largely predicts how far they will be able to go. It is probably the most determinative factor in an adult citizen’s life.*

Millions of Americans are trying to dispute credit reports every month, with the numbers growing. While they wait for the errors to be corrected, the three main corporations mentioned above have built machines to slow or prevent their lives from being restored. The more they can slow the process, the less money they have to spend. And they are openly circumventing the laws and rules that (bipartisan) Congressional committees have put in place. 

These corporations, Transunion, Experian, and Equifax are collectively referred to as the CRA’s, or nationwide credit reporting agencies. They provide the essential commodity of credit reports. The data that they package and render into this commodity is obtained from Data Furnishers, who we will examine later.

A CRA profits from its products whether the information is accurate or not. Selling wrongful or mistaken data does not cost these corporations anything, but correcting that data does. In a logical world, the cost of repairing data mistakes (and people’s lives) would be factored into the process of making profits from that data. That is the opposite of what has happened. The CRAs are an industry that exploded into unregulated productivity, far faster than any attempts to deal with the hardships that industry is creating for people. 

The pandemic increased hardship all around, leading to a significant percentage of the population needing to rely on its credit in order to survive. Depriving vulnerable people access to that credit further adds to the growing wave of economic loss and suffering.

The government body attempting to monitor and regulate the three main CRAs is the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, or CFPB. As these two groups struggle over rules to protect people, the gap between regulations and compliance continues to widen. More and more Americans are trying to dispute credit report mistakes every year, and the rising number of those dispute claims that are being dismissed or denied has been kept from the CFPB until recently. The scope of the problem that was being covered up came to light and led to an October 13th letter from the Select Congressional Subcommittee on the Corona Virus to the Director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), Rohit Chopra.

In that letter, the destructive and potentially sinister actions of the CRAs and their Data Furnishers were brought out.

What had become apparent was that the CRAs are using their Data Furnishers to effectively launder claimant’s disputed credit reports out of the system entirely. Over half of the disputed Experian credit reports were farmed out to Data Furnishers last year. More than 60% of Equifax credit reports, and 80% of the Transunion credit reports that were disputed got farmed out in the same year.

After several years of scrutiny, it has come to the attention of the CFPB that the practices of these Data Furnishers has been to reject over half of the claims on loopholes that do not even require that the envelopes the disputes come in be opened. They are rejecting disputes wholesale because of reasons as simple as envelope, font, and color of print ink.

Millions of Americans’ last shot at financial redemption are being thrown away, unopened. Even preparing their request for relief by using the templates provided by U.S. government websites can cause a person’s claim to be disqualified. It adds insult to injury. Consider that after a person has been financially ruined and made to prepare elaborate written proofs with documentation, that those proofs will be summarily discarded, never even to be read. 

It is hoped that such a glaring fact as that may stir peoples’ attention to this problem when individual narratives and sheer weight of numbers have failed. 

This unregulated wave of Americans being unfairly kicked out of the productive class has only begun. Many more lives will be destroyed so these three corporations may continue to profit without limit.

We at Consumer Attorneys believe that citizens deserve better, and we support the efforts of the CFPB to bring the practices of the CRAs and their Data Furnishers further into the light of public scrutiny.

Dan Cohen

Founding Partner, Consumer Attorneys

 

Daniel Cohen is the Founding Partner of Consumer Attorneys
About the author
Daniel Cohen
See more post

Daniel Cohen is the Founder of Consumer Attorneys. Daniel manages the firm’s branding, marketing, client intake and business development efforts. Since 2017, he is a member of the National Association of Consumer Advocates and the National Consumer Law Center. Mr. Cohen is a nationally-recognized practitioner of consumer protection law. He has a wealth of proven legal experience in the US in: collective claims, representing visually impaired people who believe their rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act have been violated in both the physical and digital environments, corporate governance and dispute resolution. Read more

Contact Us
INVESTIGATIVE ENGAGEMENT AGREEMENT

You, (“Client,” “you”), and Consumer Attorneys PLC (“CA” or “we”), located at 8095 N. 85th Way, Scottsdale, AZ 85258 (“CA”) , hereby enter into this limited scope retainer agreement whereby you agree to grant CA the exclusive authority to investigate your potential consumer law claim(s), including but not limited to potential violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”), Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), Equal Credit Opportunity Act (“ECOA”), Electronic Funds Transfer Act “EFTA”), Fair Credit Billing Act (“FCPA”), and/or the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA”) (collectively referenced as “consumer protection statutes”). 1Please read carefully before signing:

Authorization

You authorize CA to investigate your potential consumer law claim(s) under state and federal consumer protection statutes. You authorize CA to contact third parties on your behalf for the limited purpose of investigating your potential consumer law claims. “Third parties” include but are not limited to consumer reporting agencies, creditors, lenders, debt collectors, rental agencies, employers, courts, and law enforcement agencies.

CA’s Exclusive Investigative Period

CA agrees to investigate your potential consumer law claims in good faith. By signing this agreement, you agree to give CA the exclusive right to investigate your potential consumer law claim(s) for the next 180 days (“Exclusive Investigative Period”). For the duration of the Exclusive Investigative Period, you agree that you will not communicate with any other law firm or legal representative about your potential consumer law claim(s). You agree to forgo any previously scheduled consultation or case review until CA’s Exclusive Investigative Period concludes.

Termination of Exclusive Investigation Period

CA agrees that the Exclusive Investigative Period may not extend beyond 180 days without your prior written consent.

At any time between the date of this agreement and the expiration of CA’s Exclusive Investigative Period, CA may inform you of the outcome of its investigation. If CA’s investigation reveals that you have an actional consumer law claim, CA may ask you to sign a formal retainer agreement. If CA’s investigation does not reveal an actionable consumer law claim, you will receive an e-mail that states CA will not represent you in any further pursuit of your potential claim(s).

The relationship between you and CA automatically terminates at 5pm on the 180th day of the Exclusive Investigative Period or your receipt of CA’s written notice to decline representation, whichever comes sooner. At the conclusion of the Exclusive Investigative Period or upon receipt of CA’s written declination of representation, you are permitted to seek alternative legal counsel without penalty.

Nothing in this agreement should be construed as a promise or guarantee that CA will represent you in a consumer lawsuit at any point in time. CA reserves the right to decline to represent you for any reason permitted by relevant laws and ethical rules.

Your Involvement and Promises to us

You agree to meaningfully participate and cooperate in CA’s investigation of your potential consumer law claim(s). You agree to immediately inform CA if your mailing address, e-mail address, or phone number changes at any point during the Exclusive Investigative Period.
You agree to provide all relevant information, communications, documents, materials, and all other similar instruments to CA and its representatives during the Exclusive Investigative Period. You understand that your failure to provide all relevant information, communications, documents, and materials to CA during the Exclusive Investigative Period may hinder, delay or otherwise frustrate CA’s investigation of your potential consumer law claim(s).

You agree, under penalty of perjury, to provide complete, accurate, and truthful information to CA. All documents and communications, oral or written, past or future, provided to CA during the Exclusive Investigative Period and anytime thereafter are presumed by CA to be true, complete, and accurate.

Fees and Costs Incurred During Exclusive Investigative Period

CA agrees that you will not incur any out-of-pocket fees or costs during CA’s Exclusive Investigative Period. However, if CA agrees to represent you in a consumer lawsuit, CA may recover the fees and costs incurred during the Exclusive Investigative Period from the Defendant pursuant to a future settlement or judgment.

You agree that CA has a right to place a lien on any future monetary recovery obtained by client related to the claims identified during CA’s Exclusive Investigative Period or as a result of CA’s investigative efforts. If you refuse to cooperate with CA in the formal pursuit of the consumer law claim(s) it identifies during or after the Exclusive Investigative Period, you agree that CA has the right to recover the fees and costs it incurred while investigating your potential consumer law claim(s).

Authorization to Use Your Electronic Signature

CA will send you any and all documents that require your signature. You authorize CA to affix your electronic signature to requests, disclosures, or other forms that CA deems reasonably necessary to the investigation of your potential consumer law claim(s) upon receipt of your approval or after the 7th day after the document was sent to you, whichever comes first. Your electronic signature will be used on any and all other subsequent documents that will need signature, affirmation, acknowledgment, or any other forms of authentication in reference to this matter under the above referenced procedure.

1You also agree to give CA the exclusive authority to investigate potential violations of state-specific consumer protection statutes.

All Rights Reserved. Without Prejudice. CONSUMER ATTORNEYS

FORM # INV2024CA119

Attorney Advertising, Prior Results Do Not Guarantee A Similar Outcome. This website is for informational purposes only and does not contain legal advice. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

© 2024 Consumer Attorneys PLC. All Rights Reserved.