What’s the effect of incomplete information on a consumer’s financial responsibility?

  • Blog
  • What’s the effect of incomplete information on a consumer’s financial responsibility?
Contact Us
1
2
3
22 Apr, 2024
11 min
398
incomplete information on financial responsibility

It does not affect a consumer’s financial responsibility.

Does having incomplete or incorrect customer info, such as a wrong user number, affect your overall financial responsibility when you make your payments?

It’s a known fact that consumers should pay their debts early. However, one might wonder what will happen if a consumer attempts to make a payment to a wrong account number in the bid to pay the debts.

Find a Top Consumer Lawyer Near You

If you are looking for a consumer law lawyer near me, look no further than our experienced and dedicated team. With over 10 years of experience helping clients with issues related to debt collectors, background check companies, credit reporting agencies, and more, we have helped over 10,000 satisfied clients receive over 250 million dollars in monetary compensation. Our services are free for clients, and we are committed to fighting for your consumer rights. Contact us today to schedule a consultation and find out how we can help you.

This happened in the case of Hauge v. Amerihome Mortgage Company. Let’s dive in and find out the law’s position on such an issue.

Facts of the case

The plaintiff made mortgage payments using an online payment processor. For three consecutive months, the payments were still processed even though the plaintiff entered the wrong account number. But in the fourth month, the payment was rejected because of the wrong account number entered.

Subsequently, the plaintiff attempted to make the payment via check, but it was rejected due to the same wrong account number issue. As the issue persevered, the plaintiff’s report was hit with delinquency for the missed payment. This resulted in reducing the plaintiff’s credit scores and ruining their chances of obtaining a home equity line of credit.

The plaintiff disputed the delinquency as a credit reporting error and later initiated an action against the defendant, seeking damages for the defendant’s violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

The verdict and lessons

It was found that the defendant’s report stating the plaintiff’s payments were late was technically accurate but materially misleading.

The plaintiff submitted payments on time but due to entering a wrong account number, the defendant chose not to apply the payments to the plaintiff’s account.

The reality is that the plaintiff actually attempted to make the payment early, but the payment was rejected by the defendant. The omission of a single digit in a ten-digit account number by the plaintiff has absolutely no bearing on the plaintiff’s financial responsibility.

There is no question as to whether the plaintiff attempted to make the payments on time. After all, the payments were accepted for the initial three months even though the account number was wrong.

Since the defendant’s report that the plaintiff’s payments were late came without an explanation of the surrounding circumstances, it could have been expected to have an unfavorable effect.

We understand the twists and turns that come with the credit environment, and we’re eager to help you navigate them. Sign up today for any of our legal packages for credit monitoring, identity protection, and much more.

Share
Daniel Cohen is the Founding Partner of Consumer Attorneys
About the author
Daniel Cohen
See more post

Daniel Cohen is the Founder of Consumer Attorneys. Daniel manages the firm’s branding, marketing, client intake and business development efforts. Since 2017, he is a member of the National Association of Consumer Advocates and the National Consumer Law Center. Mr. Cohen is a nationally-recognized practitioner of consumer protection law. He has a wealth of proven legal experience in the US in: collective claims, representing visually impaired people who believe their rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act have been violated in both the physical and digital environments, corporate governance and dispute resolution. Read more

Contact Us
ZERO COST INVESTIGATION RETAINER AGREEMENT

This investigation retainer is a conditional agreement between Consumer Attorneys PLC, located at 8245 N. 85th Way, Scottsdale, AZ 85258 ("CA"), and a potential client, ("Client," "you") pertaining to a consumer law matter ("matter"). Please read carefully before signing:

Authorization

Client hereby voluntarily authorizes CA to investigate the matter as a potential violation of federal law arising out of the FCRA, FDCPA, or other related laws or statutes, or other financial instruments, pertaining to you.

Investigation

CA agrees to investigate this matter to the best of its ability in order to ascertain whether the matter constitutes a potential violation of federal law arising out of the FCRA, FDCPA, or other related laws or statutes, or other financial instruments, pertaining to you.

Client agrees to provide all relevant information, communications, documents, materials, and all other similar instruments to CA.

Client agrees, under penalty of perjury, to be truthful to the best of the client`s ability. All documents and communications, oral or written, past or future, are presumed by CA to be true, complete, and accurate for the sake of investigating this matter.

Duration

CA agrees that the investigation period may not extend to more than one hundred eighty days (180) from the time of signing this document.

Client agrees to forgo any other legal advice, consultation, or any other communications, oral or written, with any and all legal representative(s) in reference to this matter at hand for the period of one hundred and eighty days (180) from the time of signing this document.

Application

CA reserves the right to inform the Client of the outcome of the investigation within one hundred eighty days (180) from the time of signing this document via electronic mail or any other such electronic communication. The outcome has two (2) possible resolutions: a) Acceptance or b) Denial.

“Acceptance” means that CA has sent an electronic communication to you regarding its finding of sufficient reason to pursue a legal claim for the matter and its intent to enter into a retainer agreement to effectuate this claim.

“Denial” means that CA has sent an electronic communication to you regarding its finding of insufficient reason to pursue a legal claim for the matter and its intent not to enter into a retainer agreement to effectuate this claim.

Fees

CA agrees that the Client will not incur any fees or costs for this investigative retainer.

Compliance

Client agrees that CA has a right to place a lien or any other such financial instruments for non-compliance with this document. The lien only applies to any and all third-party representatives on this matter, and not the Client.

Confirmation

Client agrees that Client`s electronic signature will be used voluntarily, automatically, and without prior permission, on any and all other subsequent documents that will need signature, affirmation, acknowledgment, or any other forms of authentication in reference to this matter.

CA agrees to inform the Client of all pertinent and relevant information in reference to this matter in a timely manner, without delay, via electronic communication.

All Rights Reserved. Without Prejudice. CONSUMER ATTORNEYS

FORM # INV2024CA119

Attorney Advertising, Prior Results Do Not Guarantee A Similar Outcome. This website is for informational purposes only and does not contain legal advice. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

© 2024 Consumer Attorneys PLC. All Rights Reserved.